This presentation will be a fast-paced exhibition of how student understanding was demonstrated in a lesson from Unraveling Genetics to Raise the Steaks. The implementation of this lesson in as well as evidence of learning, will be presented with information on how to make timely changes to instruction in reaction to formative assessments of student comprehension in a way that promotes mastery of disciplinary core ideas. The concepts presented will be from a lesson that was evaluated and implemented in a 7th-grade life science classroom in rural Minnesota and will include possible modifications and accommodations for a variety of student needs. The Science and Engineering Practice most focused on will be comparing and evaluating sources of information.
This session will detail how the California Wildfire Assessment Task (HS) was modified for use as a formative assessment to evaluate student skills relative to the SEPs of Data Analysis, Evaluating and Communicating Information, and Engaging in Argument from Evidence as well as the CCCs of Cause and Effect and Scale, Proportion and Quantity. Evidence of student learning will be shared in the forms of both student quotes and written work samples; tools used to both evaluate the evidence of student understanding collected within this assessment as well as the modifications of future lessons to support student growth in use of the claim, evidence and reasoning framework. This presentation aligns with the designing and implementing HQIM strand as modifications made to the assessment task, including scaffolding to support student sense-making and argument construction, will be shared. Additional details regarding mid-point and summative assessments of these skills will also be outlined.
"For my STEM implementation project, I will implement the assessment task “Are All Bacteria Harmful in Food?” to explore the effective use of high-quality, three-dimensional assessments in the high school science classroom. This work directly supports the conference theme “Evidence of Student Learning” by using the task to evaluate students’ conceptual understanding, growth, and application of scientific practices.
In alignment with the conference strand “Designing and Implementing High-Quality Instructional Materials and Assessments to Support 3D Teaching and Learning,” I will share insights from the development, implementation, and analysis of the assessment. This includes evaluating students’ ability to analyze and interpret data, as well as using that evidence to inform differentiated instruction. The session aims to demonstrate how thoughtfully designed 3D assessments can not only measure learning but also guide instructional decisions to better support all learners."
TAKEAWAYS:
Attendees will leave with practical strategies for how to implement and adjust instruction to support student mastery when evaluating and integrating new lessons.
Participants will gain strategies for collecting and evaluating evidence of student sense-making through the use of formative 3-D assessments. Specific scaffolding tools to support student analysis and evaluation of data will be shared.
High quality 3D assessment tasks, like "Are All Bacteria Harmful in Food?", can reveal how well students apply core ideas, crosscutting concepts, and science practices, while also helping teachers tailor instruction to meet diverse learning needs.
Attendees should leave this session with an example of tying learning to their community or area which can hook students into learning more about where they live.
SPEAKERS:
Anna Ammerman, Samantha Dolen, Nicole Grojean