|
Veronica
Hey, we appreciate the feedback about the Gravity and Orbits SciPack. Thank you for this. Our intention is to help provide self-directed, on-demand interactive nuggets to help teachers with refreshers on specific science concepts they are charged to teach. The pedagogical implications chunk is also supposed to assist with translating that subject matter for the classroom, and help discuss what is pedagogical appropriate by grade level from a cognitive perspective across the K-2, 3-5, 6-8, 9-12 levels, what are promising strategies to facilitate learning, and what are common pre-conceptions. What did you think of this section and how might we improve it?
A quick review of this PI object for my edification (it has been a while since I taught this stuff), revealed that gravity is a term that can be introduced as something that pulls things towards the Earth, but at the K-2 grade level the term is not necessarily meaningful. I recall the issues for my student even at the 5-6 grade level, e.g., understanding the differences between mass, weight, etc. and found the book "how students learn" from the National Academies pretty helpful. One example discussed the challenges of students understanding how a table could "push back" on a book, as it doesn't look like a "spring scale" and suggested some illustrations where a "wooden plank" spring-like mechanism may be used to "make the connections" (if I recall correctly).
Thank you again for this wonderful feedback and best of success with you students Veronica!
|