Article Review
This article was written to teach planning NGSS-Based Instruction. One of the authors, Mary Colson began with a mineral identification activity while considering how to start her first year ... See More
This article was written to teach planning NGSS-Based Instruction. One of the authors, Mary Colson began with a mineral identification activity while considering how to start her first year of Earth science. Nevertheless, she soon realized that students were not sufficiently curious or interested to explore the deeper mysteries and figure out the real reason beyond the scope of the task the teacher gave them. Based on this, in order to engage students in an authentic science investigation and to know what comprises an authentic classroom science experience, the Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS Lead States 2013) explicitly states a key idea that authentic classroom science should look a lot like authentic scientific research. Giving Koper’s team as an example, their work began with a compelling driving question, proceeded through a scientific exploration about seismic events of something unknown, and yielded a fundamental insight into our universe. In other words, they focused not on what was already known but on how scientific exploration might reveal something new. Accordingly the article further emphasizes three things students need to do in the science class, which are pursuing authentic questions, engaging in scientific practices, and coming up with big explanatory ideas.
Referring to NGSS discussed in this article, to become a more successful educator in the future, I summarize the following applications. Firstly, although directly asking some scientific questions and then encourage elementary students to find the answer may help them understand the problems sometimes, in most cases I will just show the videos or illustrate the phenomenon to them at the beginning, meanwhile letting them pursue interesting ideas and questions individually. Throughout the process of seizing the opportunity to join my students in making sense of their measurements, observations, and tentative explanations, I believe this method will produce a better teaching and learning effect compared with the former because it is certainly comprehensible that everyone are more likely to seek the result to a question confusing and puzzling themselves. Furthermore, I have to admit real learning takes time. Instead of directly informing my students scientific research results, I have preferences for practicing science together with them in the lab so as to arise their curiosity and optimism about making sense of various scientific observations. Indisputably it is common for them to try something new and fail in it, but I may never convert the science class into a teacher-centered scene.