by: G. Brent Dalrymple
Free Member Price $0.10 Nonmember Price
Add to Cart
Add to Wish List
Add to Collection
Login or Create a Free Account
Type Journal ArticlePub Date 10/1/2000Stock # tst00_067_07_44Volume 067Issue 07
Visit the Forums
Good Arguments
This article does a good job in making a claim and backing that claim up, as well as discussing the opposing view. The author includes evidence and explanations of how scientists date rocks ... See More
This article does a good job in making a claim and backing that claim up, as well as discussing the opposing view. The author includes evidence and explanations of how scientists date rocks and stars. The author also makes a good argument of why creationism should not be taught in science classrooms, but could be taught in other subjects, such as history, philosophy, and religion courses.
Cosmologic Evolution
This article presents evidence to support its claim of cosmological evolution and explains how the evidence was derived and verified. It also, briefly, discusses what Scientific Creationism ... See More
This article presents evidence to support its claim of cosmological evolution and explains how the evidence was derived and verified. It also, briefly, discusses what Scientific Creationism is and is not. For lessons where students are learning about deep time or discussing evidence, this provides the teacher with background knowledge to guide their lesson development.
NSTA Press produces classroom-ready activities, hands-on approaches to inquiry, relevant professional development, the latest scientific education news and research, assessment and standards-based instruction.
Learn More