T. R. Girill Society for Technical Communication/Lawrence Livermore Nat. Lab. (retired) [email protected]
Technical Writing: Structured Abstracts Show Their Scaffolding
From the Past
Around the start of the 20th century, medical doctors began organizing their published research reports and articles into four standard sections: introduction, methods, results, and discussion. This IMRD structure is common practice throughout science and engineering articles today because practitioners in nonmedical fields, eager to share the prestige and influence that medical doctors enjoyed, actively copied their IMRD format.
Now, in the 21st century, a new trend has started in medical journals that every science student struggling to draft an effective technical abstract can beneficially copy. The influential Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) has begun publishing only 'structured abstracts.' Actually, all good science abstracts are carefully structured, but JAMA now telegraphs that structure to readers by requiring writers to organize their text under explicit section headings (so they are really 'structure-revealed' abstracts). It will probably take years for other scientific fields to copy this structure- revealed approach officially, as happened before. But meanwhile, the section headings provide (private) scaffolding that can benefit any student unsure how to design an effective STEM abstract and then share it reliably with readers who need to understand it efficiently.
Structure Specifics
JAMA actually uses somewhat different abstract-section headings for different kinds of article (clinical research vs. topical field review, for example). But the basic section signals, most relevant to student project abstracts, are (https://jama.network.com/journals/jama):
*Question--that the reported project tries to answer. *Findings--the result(s) in one sentence. *Meaning--concise interpretation of the findings (e.g., 'among infants undergoing heart surgery, delivering nitric oxide into the cardiopulminary bypass did NOT increase ventilator-free survival') *Importance--relevance of the findings to the clinical practice (of readers) and the future research (of competing scientists). *Objective-- *Design and participants-- *Interactions-- *Main outcomes-- *Results-- *Conclusions-- A more fine-grained but still concise repeat of the 4 topics above, addressed to readers focused on (and hence searching for) very specific facets of the project reported.
Benefits for Writers and Readers
These specific headings used to reveal the structure of a JAMA abstract may later adapt to field-relevant needs if such structure- revealed abstracts spread across the sciences as IMRD organizing did for report text. But we don't need to wait for that to reap significant benefits today.
For Writers
Anyone who struggles to build a thorough but concise technical abstract can use the JAMA subheads as a drafting guide, an inventory of topics to address (in that order) while they deploy their (very) limited budget of words to explain to strangers the work that they performed, the methods used, and its significance for others. Several iterations, guided by these subheads as a checklist, are often needed to achieve a useful yet terse summarization.
For Readers
Limited-English or below-grade-level readers can likewise use the JAMA abstract subheads as a checklist of text features to search for as they work through and decode terse STEM abstracts written by others (professional scientists or fellow students too). Every clause in a good abstract is contributing something significant, and the JAMA heads can serve as clues for locating and extracting that dense but valuable information.
For Professionalization
Imagining the constraints on professional scientists and engineers as they design the technical text that they share may be hard for young or inexperienced STEM students. The JAMA abstract subheads offer an authentic, explicit window on to the information-sharing challenges that real-life clinicians, researchers, and other STEM professionals face as part of their working lives.
[To help your students view technical writing text engineering, see http://writeprofessionally.org/techlit/text-engineering For more on crafting science and engineering abstracts, see http://writeprofessionally.org/techlit/abstracts-analysis]
|